Journalartikel - Wissenschaftlicher Artikel | 2016 | Peer reviewed

Impact Analysis of Different Operation Strategies for Battery Energy Storage Systems Providing Primary Control Reserve

Autor*innen

Fleer, Johannes ; Stenzel, Peter

Zeitschrift

Journal of energy storage

DOI

10.1016/j.est.2016.02.003

Weitere Details

Sprache

englisch

Darstellungsform

Text

Band

Seitenbereich

320 - 338

Schlüsselwörter

Ancillary services , Battery energy storage systems , Frequency regulation , Primary control reserve

Zitierstile

Fleer, J., & Stenzel, P. (2016). Impact Analysis of Different Operation Strategies for Battery Energy Storage Systems Providing Primary Control Reserve. Journal of Energy Storage, 8, 320–338. doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.02.003

In die Zwischenablage kopieren

Fleer, J. and Stenzel, P., 2016. Impact Analysis of Different Operation Strategies for Battery Energy Storage Systems Providing Primary Control Reserve. Journal of energy storage, 8, pp.320–338.

In die Zwischenablage kopieren

Fleer, Johannes & Stenzel, Peter 2016. Impact Analysis of Different Operation Strategies for Battery Energy Storage Systems Providing Primary Control Reserve. Journal of energy storage 8, 320–338.

In die Zwischenablage kopieren

Download
RDF/XML-Format
JSON-LD-Format
Turtle-Format
N3-Format

Zitierstile

In die Zwischenablage kopieren

Fleer, J. and Stenzel, P., 2016. Impact Analysis of Different Operation Strategies for Battery Energy Storage Systems Providing Primary Control Reserve. Journal of energy storage, 8, pp.320–338.

In die Zwischenablage kopieren

Download
RDF/XML-Format
JSON-LD-Format
Turtle-Format
N3-Format

American Psychological Association 6th edition (DOI)

Anglia Ruskin University - Harvard

Gesellschaft für Bildung und Forschung in Europa - Harvard